For Notre Dame, Where Does Reality Lie?
September 15th, 2011 . by adamnThe Irish just had to open a season with high expectations 0-2, didn’t they? There could be no other way. Otherwise, media types and college football fans would have nowhere to go with witty banter, one-liner sarcasm, and other snarky comments. Notre Dame is just more interesting to talk about on a national level (even over other traditional powers such as Oklahoma or Nebraska-they don’t get the national commentary that ND is inclined to get). The Irish move the meter. They are Charlie Sheen. Everyone other program is Jon Cryer. One elicits an emotion-positive for one-half of the country, negative for the other half. The other has his small group of fans, and then nobody else cares. Who do you think is more likely to get roasted? You guessed it.
So, because Notre Dame is interesting, people talk about them-and their expectations- a lot in the preseason. Sometimes the expectations are low, but mostly they are at least somewhat high. Then, if the Irish don’t meet expectations, everything is still okay, because the door is now open for people to take their shots. They don’t hold back either, we’re talking Mike Tyson-to-the-groin shots. Something worthy of 20 million views on Youtube.
It’s commentary like this:
“Unrealistic expectations have been killing Notre Dame coaches and lining the pockets of therapists for too long now. The people who rank Notre Dame (0-2 on your television dial) in the top 25 before every season are the same people who pine for the days of the Cold War and a Saturday night spent with “Hee Haw.” There’s a chance — a small chance, but a chance — that removing Notre Dame from consideration from polls and eliminating the Irish from the incessant public cacophony of prognostication will allow them to go about their business in relative calm.
It’s the Zen approach: If there are no expectations, there can be no disappointment. ”
Basically, it’s talk that centers around “it’s a new era, with new football powers, and Notre Dame can no longer compete on the same level”. Irish fans have heard every reason in the book: Academics, weather, religious overtones, geography, etc.
The question is, where does reality lie? Is the “Notre Dame is dead” commentary real, or is it just rhetoric that even its own authors will turn against with “Return to Glory!” claims should the Irish get hot on the field?
This will sound cliche, but the truth is probably somewhere in the middle. ND can win, but at this point there are better “destination jobs” in college sports.
Here are the facts:
-The right coach is needed. That doesn’t mean hiring one with a championship ring. It means finding a coach ready to break through. Bob Stoops, Jim Tressel, Pete Carroll, and Urban Meyer were not “sure things” when they landed the jobs that would turn them into “sure things”.
-Notre Dame is no longer, and never will be, what they were under Rockne, Leahy, or Parseghian. Competiton is too strong, and kids have too many options. The game is more sophisticated, with more good players and coaches than ever. The war for recruiting is a bloodbath. (There is a 5-star recruit this cycle from Ohio that was committed to the Buckeyes. Tressel got forced out, and the kid signed with Michigan. A Buckeye that became a Wolverine. Woody Hayes would rather have licked a toilet seat than see that happen. But, that is how things go these days, kids are not bound by tradition like the old days.
-They can be what they were under Holtz. They can be in the championship picture. Notre Dame still has an awful lot of appeal, and that is without winning for 20 years. What if they actually did something on the field?
-The academic thing can be an issue. Notre Dame alumni like to think “Come here, play football, get a degree in four years, and no matter what, you’ll be set with a good job for life-how can you turn down that opportunity?” That has an appeal to some kids. But, most stud recruits see football itself as their calling. Class is like a hemorrhoid that most be put up with. ND is going to have to let some “borderline” kids in, much as they did for Holtz, or the talk about keeping up with the Alabamas of the world will be true. If the adminstration is willing to “play ball” ND can compete.
-Geography is an issue. The best kids play in the South. With plenty of institutions that have sex appeal (and I don’t mean the student body, though that helps), making it an easy choice for recruits to stay close to home. ND knows it has to recruit nationally. They must be able to pluck talented kids from every region. Weis showed ND can still get skill players from just about any state they want. Kelly started to show thet can get defensive line talent from the South last cycle, but he had to work magic to do so (he made 300lb Stephon Tuitt disappear, and reappear in a single day-suck it, David Copperfield). If he can continue that success, ND can compete.
-Yep, South Bend winters suck. It may scare off some kids, but the Irish have always been able to recruit California, and even has a certain stud linebacker from Hawaii that was willing to trade pineapples for a winter coat. So, weather is an issue, but it is doubtful that it can keep Notre Dame from making a run.
Look, the fact is, Notre Dame is a challenge. It needs the right coach (same as everywhere else, Florida wasn’t winning with Ron Zook), must balance the academic issue (don’t announce it to the world, but let some kids in that run a 4.4 and need a lot of tutor help), must recruit in the warm-weather states (they have done so, but not at the level needed), and maybe, just maybe, start spraying CFCs to screw up some weather patterns.
However, unless Brian Kelly bombs (he fits the “right coach” criteria, he took Cincinnati to BCS bowls), the Blarney doesn’t think Notre Dame expectations need to go the way of the newspaper. As of now, the Irish can still win.
