Another week down, another reason to purchase some Just For Men to rid myself of Fighting Irish-induced gray hair follicles. After Purdue, I am officially 10 years older than when the season began. Anyway, here’s what I saw this week. Do you agree, or do I need my contact prescription adjusted?
Did you see: A coach that deserves some credit for making a depleted offense respectable? Not many coaches would feel comfortable going into a game without their best wide receiver (also possibly the nation’s best) and running back, while having limited used of their starting quarterback (another one of the nation’s best). Charlie made it work. He used Mr. Dangerous (Golden Tate) in a variety of ways, and got big time production out of forgotten-man Robert Hughes, as well as calling on the walking mismatch known as Kyle Rudolph. He put his team in position to run the ball with authority-and they did. The points probably didn’t match the production, but Weis did about as good as can be done in that situation.
Did you see: The reincarnation of Joe Cool? I didn’t quite see that either, but Jimmy Clausen came damn close. Big throw after big throw, including tattooing the game winner to Rudolph’s chest (he’ll have the “x” from the point of the ball as a keepsake forever). If funny fatman John Candy were still alive, Jimmy would have seen him in the crowd, I think (read up on Joe Montana and 49er lore, people, oh, and mention that anecdote to any Bengal fan you know). Jimmy turned “hurt big toe and no go” into a possible career-defining moment. ND needs Jimmy Clausen.
Did you see: The most versatile man is show business? That would be playmaker extraordinaire Golden Tate. He catches passes, returns punts, plays quarterback, and takes handoffs. He can do drama/suspense (game-winning catch against Michigan State), comedy (subsequent dive into the band against Michigan state, and leprechaun hat after Purdue), and mystery (where did his hands go?). He also sells popcorn at intermission.
Did you see: Darius Fleming getting acquainted with the backfield? 3 tackles for a loss is a good day for any defender. Fleming has the chance to be a disruptive force at end or linebacker for a defense that desperately needs it.
Did you see: A defense that thought it was playing a game of tag (not the good kind with the body spray and hot girls either)? “You’re it!” “Hey, why the hell is he still running?” Tackling must be better, or the Irish will be burned to the tune of 4 or more losses.
Did you see: A defense that looks better on the bench? Until the aforementioned tackling, pass rush, run defense, and pass coverage (should I have just said everything?) gets better, I will continue to believe that nothing good can happen with the “D” on the field.
That’s what I saw against Purdue, was there anything else to be seen? And, what will we see against Washington?