Asking A Good Question, But Getting A Blonde Answer
August 27th, 2009 . by adamnQ: Why Will Notre Dame do so well this year?
A: The schedule is easy, it has Nevada, Washington, Washington State, UConn, etc. The Irish will be favored in every game except USC.
The Wisdom of Blonde

That’s what the consensus is among savvy media types. Even Lou Holtz is in on this (well, actually, this is not surprising, he has picked Notre Dame to win every game since he joined ESPN, and hasn’t picked the Irish to even have a bad play since 1996-when he actually roamed the sideline).
The schedule is not the answer. As guys like Matt Hinton have already pointed out, The Irish had a similarly “damn easy” schedule last year. And they went .500. And lost to Syracuse. And almost to Navy (again). And almost to San Diego State.
While schools have suffered losses (Pitt doesn’t have LeSean McCoy, for example), and many are breaking in new quarterbacks, you can expect Nevada, Michigan, and Michigan State to give the Irish fits this year as well. USC is USC, and the Irish would have to tear off the clothes of at least 3 Rachel Phelps’s from Major League cut-outs to make up the point differential between the two teams.
So no, the answer isn’t the schedule. The answer is the players. It’s Clausen, Allen, Tate, Floyd, Rudolph, and the entire o-line on offense. It’s Johnson, Lewis-Moore, Fleming, Te’o, Smith, Walls, Blanton, McCarthy, and Smith (yes, a different one) on defense. Are they significantly better as a year wiser (and is Te’o a man from day 1)? Were they an underachieving bunch before? Will adding Verducci, Alford, Hart, and Young up their football prowess? How much better do players get with age (the fine wine pun is tempting here)?
If the players live up to their blue-chip status, Notre Dame will annoy a lot of haters this year. If not, ND lovers will be left to wonder what it will take to make the Irish truly viable again.